Their hypocrisy and cognitive dissonance is evident in the exception her bill would provide for government minions, i.e. law enforcement and those in the military serving in combat zones. Aside from the obvious question of how can police be "outgunned" if they have the same magazine capacity as criminals, who will continue to use standard capacity magazines if this legislation should pass, one has to ask why do 2nd-responder police, including capitol hill police that protect these hypocrite politicians, need access to standard capacity magazines holding more than 10 rounds, but you and I, as 1st-responders to a deadly threat, should be denied access to those same standard capacity magazines and be limited to sub-standard capacity magazines?
Any self-defense expert will tell you that the more rounds you are able to discharge at a threat, without having to reload, increases your chance of surviving that threat. That's one reason why police insist, and politicians agree, that they need their standard capacity magazines and should not be subjected to 10-round-limited, sub-standard capacity magazines that hypocrite politicians, afflicted with cognitive dissonance and pompous arrogance, would "allow" to we of the un-washed masses.
An additional reason for police and we "little people" to both have access to standard capacity magazines is loss of fine motor-function following an adrenaline dump that is unavoidable when fighting for your life. This, along with other variables, usually results in a low ratio of hits-to-shots fired. That's why a standard capacity magazine for 1st-responder citizens under attack by one or more criminals/terrorists/tyrants is a critical, life-saving necessity that should not be denied to us "peons" simply because elitist, corrupt, power-hungry, constitution-contemptuous politicians think that only they and other elites should have the added margin of personal safety that standard capacity magazines offer.
No comments:
Post a Comment